Goodness.

(As in: “My goodness! Where did theirs go?”)

KURT VONNEGUT ONCE OBSERVED, “FOR SOME reason, the most vocal Christians among us never mention the Beatitudes. But, often with tears in their eyes, they demand that the Ten Commandments be posted in public buildings. And of course that’s Moses, not Jesus. I haven’t heard one of them demand that the Sermon on the Mount, the Beatitudes, be posted anywhere.” Vonnegut was pointing out the basic immorality of society’s self-proclaimed moral custodians. Hate the sin but love the sinner? But that opens to a possible debate on what is sin.

“The Grand Inquisitor” by Manuel L. Quezon III, published on page A15 of the August 14, 2006 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer.

I stumbled upon that quote elsewhere; after some backtracking, I found Kurt Vonnegut’s original commentary.

While Quezon moved on to focus on a whole other matter and Vonnegut only mentioned this as part of a larger whole, isn’t anybody else bothered by Kurt Vonnegut’s logic here (and consequently MLQ’s, for agreeing with it)?

To point out the obvious, those Commandments were spoken and written by God. They were only brought down by Moses. Did Vonnegut read a different Bible? Perhaps. Some say there is no proof that they were written by God Himself.

It’s clearly implied that the Beatitudes are positive and encouraging words speaking through the humanity of Jesus. On the other hand, the Ten Commandments are feared, some daresay negative, laws that the all-powerful God sent down to Earth. It sounds appealing to favor one who is more encouraging than fearsome, but that is an either-or fallacy. That, or you’re assuming God is such a one-dimensional being. Yes.

There is no reason to pit two sets of “guidelines” against each other—much less because one was allegedly said by a mere “self-proclaimed moral custodian.”


I am no model citizen, neither am I a devout Catholic (I try!). And I never imagined posting anything like this. But this is such a silly religious debate that people have tossed around only because of its implications, not its founding logic.

Update: a somewhat offbeat metaphor lies in the current Firefox versus IceWeasel issue. See reason #3: “You’re only pitting FLOSS against FLOSS

10 replies

  1. diba sa old testament God was described as petty and stuff like that kaya nagka-great flood, tas sa new testament naging compassionate siya bigla, kaya pinadala si Jesus?

    therefore the two could’ve been written by different entities, or by the same being in different stages in His life.

    watchutinkhuh? :P

    Reply to this

  2. making contradictory rules keeps most people confused and stupid, like cows. and no, I’m not referring to women. haha.

    ganito ka ba talaga mag-isip?

    Contradictory? As I said, I am not fond religious debates because I also have questions about that.

    As for my “way of thought”, may angal ka?

    Reply to this

  3. I’m sure you’re aware that the act of thinking is stressful for humans, critical thinking especially. imo that’s where stubborn-ness and narrow-mindedness come from. some, though, have a higher tolerance to it than others. I call them homo superior. hahaha.

    pasensya sa incoherence. learning is hard.

    for you, is devout = going to mass every Sunday, or more?

    I like UP’s church btw. it’s way more serene than most churches in the metro. dunno why though.

    Reply to this

  4. “is devout = going to mass every Sunday, or more?”

    No, I don’t think so. I know some people who have holy communion without going to confession first (I guess because they think they haven’t sinned–in what, at least seven days?). I also know people who have different interpretations of the ten commandments (uh, like, how do you address pr0n?). O_o; It’s very frustrating.

    Try Claret’s (Imaculate Heart of Mary Parish). They’re both different-looking churches and both nice to behold. UP’s is way too hot to attend mass in. :D

    Reply to this

Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> Anything in between < and > will be treated as HTML, so you might want to use character entities if you have to display literal markup.

*

%d bloggers like this:
Technology & Computers - Top Blogs Philippines